Prigg v. Pennsylvania
law case
Learn about this topic in these articles:
Daniel
- In Peter Vivian Daniel
In Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842), for example, he argued that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional, claiming that the federal government could not restrict slavery in territories, and in the Dred Scott decision (1857) he joined the majority, arguing in a concurring opinion that freed…
Read More
Story
- In Joseph Story
In Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 16 Peters 539 (1842), Story, who opposed slavery, upheld the federal Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 in order to strike down state statutes concerning the recapture of escaped slaves. In Swift v. Tyson, 16 Peters 1 (1842; overruled 1938), he, in effect,…
Read More