history of Kuwait, a survey of the notable events and people in the history of Kuwait, from the 18th-century founding of the city of Kuwait to the present day. For the history of the broader region before the founding of Kuwait, see history of Arabia.

Āl Ṣabāḥ’s arrival, British protectorate, and Kuwait’s independence

The city of Kuwait—on which the State of Kuwait is centred—originated when the Banū (Banī) ʿUtūb, a group of families of the ʿAnizah tribe in the interior of the Arabian Peninsula, migrated to the area about the beginning of the 18th century. The foundation of the autonomous sheikhdom of Kuwait dates from 1756, when the settlers decided to appoint a sheikh from the Ṣabāḥ family (Āl Ṣabāḥ). During the 19th century Kuwait developed as a thriving independent trading community. Toward the end of the century one ruler, ʿAbd Allāh II (reigned 1866–92), began to move Kuwait closer to the Ottoman Empire, although he never placed his country under Ottoman rule. That trend was reversed with the accession of Mubārak the Great, who came to power by assassinating his brother ʿAbd Allāh—an act of uncustomary political violence in Kuwait. Ottoman threats to annex Kuwait prompted Mubārak to cultivate a close relationship with Britain. An 1899 treaty basically granted Britain control of Kuwait’s foreign affairs. Following the outbreak of World War I (1914–18), Kuwait became a British protectorate.

At the 1922 Conference of Al-ʿUqayr, Britain negotiated the Kuwaiti-Saudi border, resulting in substantial territorial loss for Kuwait. A memorandum in 1923 set out the border with Iraq on the basis of an unratified 1913 convention.

More From Britannica

Kuwait: History of Kuwait

The first Iraqi claim to Kuwait surfaced in 1938—the year oil was discovered in the emirate. Although neither Iraq nor the Ottoman Empire had ever actually ruled Kuwait, Iraq asserted a vague historical title. That year it also offered some rhetorical support to a merchant uprising against the emir. Following the failure of the uprising, called the Majlis Movement, Iraq continued to put forth a claim to at least part of Kuwait, notably the strategic islands of Būbiyān and Al-Warbah.

On June 19, 1961, Britain recognized Kuwait’s independence. Six days later, however, Iraq renewed its claim, which was now rebuffed first by British and then by Arab League forces. It was not until October 1963 that a new Iraqi regime formally recognized both Kuwait’s independence and, subsequently, its borders, while continuing to press for access to the islands.

Kuwait during the Iran-Iraq War

The Iran-Iraq War of 1980–88 represented a serious threat to Kuwait’s security. Kuwait, fearing Iranian hegemony in the region, saw no alternative to providing Iraq with substantial financial support and serving as a vital conduit for military supplies. Iran attacked a Kuwaiti refinery complex in 1981, which inspired subsequent acts of sabotage in 1983 and 1986. In 1985 a member of the underground pro-Iranian Iraqi radical group al-Daʿwah attempted to assassinate the Kuwaiti ruler, Sheikh Jaber al-Ahmad al-Jaber al-Sabah.

In September 1986 Iran began to concentrate its attacks on gulf shipping, largely on Kuwaiti tankers. This led Kuwait to invite both the Soviet Union (with which it had established diplomatic relations in 1963) and the United States to provide protection for its tankers in early 1987. One effect of the war was to promote closer relations between Kuwait and its conservative gulf Arab neighbours Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman, with whom Kuwait had formed the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) in 1981 in order to develop closer cooperation on economic and security issues. With the end of the Iran-Iraq War in 1988, Iraqi-Kuwaiti relations began to deteriorate. On August 2, 1990, Iraq unexpectedly invaded and conquered the country, precipitating the Persian Gulf War.

Are you a student?

Get a special academic rate on Britannica Premium.

Subscribe

Invasion of Kuwait in the Persian Gulf War

Although Iraq advanced several arguments in support of its action, the basic reasons behind the invasion of Kuwait were the perennial ones that had led earlier Iraqi regimes to seek the same result—control of Kuwait’s oil and wealth, the military advantage of frontage on the Persian Gulf, and Pan-Arabism under Iraqi leadership—as well as a way for Iraq to generate popular support in the wake of its defeat in the Iran-Iraq War. On August 8 Iraq announced its annexation of Kuwait, in spite of condemnations from the United Nations, the major world powers, the Arab League, and the European Community (now the European Union). The Kuwaitis’ vehement opposition to the Iraqi invasion, in conjunction with diplomatic efforts by the Kuwaiti government-in-exile in Saudi Arabia, did not stop Iraq from harshly imposing its rule on Kuwait.

In mid-January 1991 a coalition of countries, acting under the authority of the United Nations and led by the United States and Saudi Arabia, began launching air strikes against Iraqi forces, and five weeks later it conducted a ground assault into Kuwait and Iraq. By late February Kuwait had been liberated from Iraqi control. As hundreds of thousands of Kuwaitis returned from foreign refuges to their homes in May, the full extent of the damage created by the invasion, looting, and warfare became clear.

Political developments up to the Iraq War

The invasion and occupation affected every aspect of Kuwaiti life. More than half the population fled during the war. Although most nationals returned during 1991, many nonnationals, notably Palestinians, were not permitted to do so. A division emerged between those who had stayed behind in the resistance and those who had fled. Another developed between the majority pressing for political liberalization (specifically, for parliamentary elections) and the ruling family, whose behaviour in exile had stirred considerable popular disfavour in Kuwait. The government’s initial response—instituting martial law and staging show trials—gave way as reconstruction proceeded to a more liberal stance. This led to elections to the National Assembly in 1992, in which Islamic candidates and independent candidates sympathetic to them were successful.

In 1992 a United Nations commission formally delimited the Iraqi-Kuwaiti border in accordance with a resolution of the UN Security Council passed in April 1991, which had reaffirmed the border’s inviolability. The commission’s findings were generally favourable to Kuwait, moving the Iraqi border slightly to the north in the areas of Safwān and the contested Al-Rumaylah oil field and thereby giving Kuwait not only additional oil wells but also part of the Iraqi naval base of Umm Qaṣr. Kuwait accepted the UN’s border designation, but Iraq rejected it and continued to voice its claim to Kuwaiti territory.

The survival of the Baʿath regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq spawned an ambient fear among Kuwaitis of a repeat of the events of 1990–91. A tense standoff atmosphere prevailed, exacerbated by Iraqi troop movements along the border, until 2003, when U.S. and British forces launched an invasion of Iraq, largely from bases inside Kuwait. The fall of the Baʿath regime in the Iraq War was greeted with great relief in Kuwait, which offered critical logistic support to the United States and its allies. However, the subsequent occupation of Iraq (and the attraction of some Kuwaitis to the guerrilla insurgency that it produced) led to new political tensions.

Political reform and frequent deadlock in the 21st century

After suffering a stroke in 2001, Sheikh Jaber al-Ahmad al-Sabah, the ruling emir, carried out only a few public activities. Following Sheikh Jaber’s death in 2006, the crown prince, Sheikh Saad al-Abdullah al-Salim al-Sabah, briefly acceded as emir. Although considered too ill to rule, Sheikh Saad, who had been crown prince since the late 1970s, sparked a political crisis when he refused to abdicate in favour of Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad al-Jaber al-Sabah, the country’s former foreign minister and already its de facto leader. The succession crisis was resolved after nine days, when the Kuwaiti parliament voted to remove Saad from office moments before he himself agreed to abdicate.

Political deadlock and crisis led to frequent legislative elections in Kuwait in the early 21st century, sometimes with less than a year between them. On several occasions, crises precipitated by potential inquiries of government figures and the votes of confidence that would likely ensue led Sheikh Sabah to dissolve the parliament and call for fresh elections. Although that sidestepped crises in the short term, it left tensions between the royal family and the opposition in the parliament unresolved. At the same time, important political reforms did occur: in 2006 the 25-constituency system in place since 1980 was replaced with a new 5-constituency format meant to discourage voting along tribal lines and to make the buying of votes more difficult. Women won the right to vote in 2005, and in the legislative elections of May 2009, four female candidates became the first women to win seats in the parliament. In spite of such advances, observers suggested that the country’s patterned encounters with deadlock that only the emir was positioned to resolve would continue to recur unless the Kuwaiti political system was more thoroughly reorganized.

A period of unprecedented public dissent began in late 2011 when allegations of corruption provoked demonstrations by youth activists and members of the opposition, which resulted in the removal of the prime minister and the dissolution of the pro-government parliament. A new parliament, elected in February 2012 and dominated by the opposition, clashed frequently with cabinet ministers before it was dissolved by the Constitutional Court in June. Faced with the likelihood that new elections would produce another opposition-dominated parliament, in October the emir ordered changes to electoral rules that were widely seen as a means to guarantee a pro-government majority. The move brought thousands of Kuwaiti protesters into the streets, and police broke up demonstrations with tear gas and stun grenades. The opposition boycotted elections in December, which resulted in the lowest voter turnout in decades.

In the mid-2010s, Kuwait, like other oil-producing countries, was forced to contend with a drop in oil prices that had begun in late 2014. Facing budget deficits, the Kuwaiti government cut its subsidies for electricity, water, and fuel, which had been among the highest in the world. These measures were praised by international development groups such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, but the sudden rise in consumer prices lent new strength to the political opposition in Kuwait. Opposition groups and candidates aligned with populist agendas won nearly half of the elected seats in the parliament in November 2016 in a vote that observers saw as a reflection of the public’s unhappiness with the government’s austerity program. The renewed tension between the government and the opposition-led parliament led to multiple cabinet dismissals while several austerity measures, such as the government’s plan to implement a value-added tax (VAT) in line with an international agreement among GCC member states, were either blocked or watered down. A rise in global oil prices at the close of the decade ultimately reduced the urgency of austerity, though the emir warned about the need to reduce the country’s reliance on oil.

In 2020 the price of oil fell once again, amid the global COVID-19 pandemic, and Kuwait’s ability to meet its expenses fell with it. At the time of Sheikh Sabah’s death in September, a standoff between the parliament and the government over raising the debt ceiling remained unresolved. His half brother, Sheikh Nawaf al-Ahmad al-Jaber al-Sabah, acceded to the throne and opted to keep his predecessor’s ministers in place, but the parliamentary elections in December registered broad discontent with the government’s handling of the debt crisis. Although many of the newly elected members of parliament sought to replace the legislative body’s speaker, who was considered favourable to the government, he retained the position after a narrow vote apparently decided by the ballots of unelected cabinet ministers who participated in the parliament. In January 2021, amid these ongoing tensions between the parliament and the government, members of parliament moved to question the prime minister over his cabinet appointments. The prime minister resigned but was reappointed days later by Sheikh Nawaf, who tasked him with forming a new cabinet.